Really Singleton

Here is a piece of code I took from dofactory.com

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
class MainApp
{
    static void Main()
    {
        LoadBalancer oldbalancer = null;
        for (int i = 0; i < 15; i++)
        {
            LoadBalancer balancerNew = LoadBalancer.GetLoadBalancer();

            if (oldbalancer == balancerNew && oldbalancer != null)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("{0} SameInstance {1}", oldbalancer.Server, balancerNew.Server);
            }
            oldbalancer = balancerNew;
        }
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

class LoadBalancer
{
    private static LoadBalancer _instance;
    private List<string> _servers = new List<string>();
    private Random _random = new Random();

    private static object syncLock = new object();

    private LoadBalancer()
    {
        _servers.Add("ServerI");
        _servers.Add("ServerII");
        _servers.Add("ServerIII");
        _servers.Add("ServerIV");
        _servers.Add("ServerV");
    }

    public static LoadBalancer GetLoadBalancer()
    {
        if (_instance == null)
        {
            lock (syncLock)
            {
                if (_instance == null)
                {
                    _instance = new LoadBalancer();
                }
            }
        }

        return _instance;
    }

    public string Server
    {
        get
        {
            int r = _random.Next(_servers.Count);
            return _servers[r].ToString();
        }
    }
}

I took code from dofactory.com, nothing so fancy but I find this far good than examples with Foo and Bar additionally book from Judith Bishop on C# 3.0 Design Patterns has example about active application in mac dock.

If you look at code we are actually building new objects on for loop, so that creates new object but reuses instance as a result of which the oldbalancer and newbalancer has same instance, How? its due to static keyword used on function GetLoadBalancer(), despite of having different server value which is random list, static on GetLoadBalancer() belongs to the type itself rather than to a specific object.

Additionally there is double check locking here

if (_instance == null)
            {
                lock (syncLock)
                {
                    if (_instance == null)

since from MSDN

The lock keyword ensures that one thread does not enter a critical section of code while another thread is in the critical section. If another thread tries to enter a locked code, it will wait, block, until the object is released.

so every-time mutual-exclusion lock is issued, even if it don't need to which is unnecessary so we have null check.

Hopefully it helps in clearing more.